<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Alliance for Natural Health USA &#8211; Protecting Natural Health	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anh-usa.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anh-usa.org</link>
	<description>ANH Protects Free Speech About Natural Health Modalities, Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy, Homeopathy and Access To Natural Therapies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Drug Definition Trap: Why US Law Blocks Truthful Information That Could Help You Recover Your Health by Marly Peel		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-drug-definition-trap-why-us-law-blocks-truthful-information-that-could-help-you-recover-your-health/#comment-179531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marly Peel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86572#comment-179531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you, as always, for your vital information.  As far as I know, no other organization gives us the kind of important news on the real healthcare nutrition available vs prescription drugs.   And, you make it so easy to send a message to our representatives!  Doesn&#039;t anyone ever realize the natural way is the best way to PREVENT disease?  I&#039;m almost 76 years old &#038; remember what it was like before Big Pharma became so huge, now dominating the advertising world.  As my grandmother used to say, &quot;A ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure&quot;.  There was common sense back then...which now seems to be in short supply.
Again...thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, as always, for your vital information.  As far as I know, no other organization gives us the kind of important news on the real healthcare nutrition available vs prescription drugs.   And, you make it so easy to send a message to our representatives!  Doesn&#8217;t anyone ever realize the natural way is the best way to PREVENT disease?  I&#8217;m almost 76 years old &amp; remember what it was like before Big Pharma became so huge, now dominating the advertising world.  As my grandmother used to say, &#8220;A ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure&#8221;.  There was common sense back then&#8230;which now seems to be in short supply.<br />
Again&#8230;thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Court Halts Vaccine Policy Overhaul, Leaving Bigger Questions Unanswered by Steven Berge		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/court-halts-vaccine-policy-overhaul-leaving-bigger-questions-unanswered/#comment-178500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Berge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86268#comment-178500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The supreme court is like a back stop for any action that seriously affects the mega corporate bottom line. Way back in the late 1800&#039;s they headed off rising anti corporate sentiment by declaring that they did not want to hear whether corporations had the same rights as people, because they were &quot;of the opinion that they do,&quot; on top of the special rights they have that people don&#039;t. They effectively made law!  Then in another corporate ruling lately, they doubled down and said that money is equal to free speech, and nobody can limit the spending of money on any kind of speech. And that&#039;s why elections are so expensive. That&#039;s why nearly all candidates that win take corporate bribes. That&#039;s why, as Biden said to a room full of mega banksters after he was elected, &quot;nothing will materially change.&quot; That&#039;s why I don&#039;t vote for Republicrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The supreme court is like a back stop for any action that seriously affects the mega corporate bottom line. Way back in the late 1800&#8217;s they headed off rising anti corporate sentiment by declaring that they did not want to hear whether corporations had the same rights as people, because they were &#8220;of the opinion that they do,&#8221; on top of the special rights they have that people don&#8217;t. They effectively made law!  Then in another corporate ruling lately, they doubled down and said that money is equal to free speech, and nobody can limit the spending of money on any kind of speech. And that&#8217;s why elections are so expensive. That&#8217;s why nearly all candidates that win take corporate bribes. That&#8217;s why, as Biden said to a room full of mega banksters after he was elected, &#8220;nothing will materially change.&#8221; That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t vote for Republicrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Big Six Barriers: The Hidden Forces Suppressing Natural Health in America by Ken B		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-big-six-barriers-the-hidden-forces-suppressing-natural-health-in-america/#comment-177686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86263#comment-177686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A wonderfully articulated article.  I have two comments.  In Barrier #2, drug research in academic institutions has not been any more unbiased and reliable than similar research conducted in “for-profit research organizations”.  It is all about who is funding the research.  Indeed, corporate research in university labs gains a perception of undeserved heightened credibility.  At least drug-company research in commercial labs is more openly biased.  
There is advocacy to allow OTC supplements to display legally limited health claims on their labels.  But I wonder if such legal permission will put supplement manufacturers and retailers under greater scrutiny.  Supplements tend to be administered at much lower doses than drugs, work holistically throughout the body rather than targeting very specific organs and tissues, and take a longer time to achieve benefits.  In our quick-fix and litigious culture, people may run out of patience when, for example, an herb labeled to help with blood pressure does little after a few days or a week or two.  They give up on it; try to return it; complain to the retailer, manufacturer, appropriate government agency, or an online forum; or worst yet, file a lawsuit.  Right now, supplements can’t make health claims and therefore avoid a lot of scrutiny and litigation.  So, I am on the fence whether health claims on supplement labels will be a good thing or not, and I hope my concerns will turn out to be unwarranted.  
Our government should be removing barriers to access to supplements, including homeopathy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderfully articulated article.  I have two comments.  In Barrier #2, drug research in academic institutions has not been any more unbiased and reliable than similar research conducted in “for-profit research organizations”.  It is all about who is funding the research.  Indeed, corporate research in university labs gains a perception of undeserved heightened credibility.  At least drug-company research in commercial labs is more openly biased.<br />
There is advocacy to allow OTC supplements to display legally limited health claims on their labels.  But I wonder if such legal permission will put supplement manufacturers and retailers under greater scrutiny.  Supplements tend to be administered at much lower doses than drugs, work holistically throughout the body rather than targeting very specific organs and tissues, and take a longer time to achieve benefits.  In our quick-fix and litigious culture, people may run out of patience when, for example, an herb labeled to help with blood pressure does little after a few days or a week or two.  They give up on it; try to return it; complain to the retailer, manufacturer, appropriate government agency, or an online forum; or worst yet, file a lawsuit.  Right now, supplements can’t make health claims and therefore avoid a lot of scrutiny and litigation.  So, I am on the fence whether health claims on supplement labels will be a good thing or not, and I hope my concerns will turn out to be unwarranted.<br />
Our government should be removing barriers to access to supplements, including homeopathy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Big Six Barriers: The Hidden Forces Suppressing Natural Health in America by DJD		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-big-six-barriers-the-hidden-forces-suppressing-natural-health-in-america/#comment-177670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86263#comment-177670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I guess y&#039;all don&#039;t like THE TRUTH about what is acutely possible RE: HEALING]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess y&#8217;all don&#8217;t like THE TRUTH about what is acutely possible RE: HEALING</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Big Six Barriers: The Hidden Forces Suppressing Natural Health in America by DJD		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-big-six-barriers-the-hidden-forces-suppressing-natural-health-in-america/#comment-177643</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86263#comment-177643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. However on one point, I&#039;m sad to inform you that the good ole USA is NOT the R&#038;D capitol of natural health. Why? Well let&#039;s start with the fact that since 2013 Germany has been using specific peptides &#038; other natural remedies/processes to repair hip &#038; leg joints instead of very painful (1st hand experience) surgery to cut out part of the hip &#038; leg joint to replace both with titanium parts. A 2nd innovation is the fact that I&#039;ve learned broken bones can &#038; have been totally healed in 8 to 10 days with rigorous peptide treatments, some  form of hyperbaric pressure process - I think this is the name, still learning about it but the testimony is irrefutable. So until the AMA/Big Pharma Complex&#039;s collusion is defeated, these sorts of natural treatments will not be allowed in this country since &quot;We the People&quot; become cured and are no longer patients (aka customers for life).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. However on one point, I&#8217;m sad to inform you that the good ole USA is NOT the R&amp;D capitol of natural health. Why? Well let&#8217;s start with the fact that since 2013 Germany has been using specific peptides &amp; other natural remedies/processes to repair hip &amp; leg joints instead of very painful (1st hand experience) surgery to cut out part of the hip &amp; leg joint to replace both with titanium parts. A 2nd innovation is the fact that I&#8217;ve learned broken bones can &amp; have been totally healed in 8 to 10 days with rigorous peptide treatments, some  form of hyperbaric pressure process &#8211; I think this is the name, still learning about it but the testimony is irrefutable. So until the AMA/Big Pharma Complex&#8217;s collusion is defeated, these sorts of natural treatments will not be allowed in this country since &#8220;We the People&#8221; become cured and are no longer patients (aka customers for life).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Court Halts Vaccine Policy Overhaul, Leaving Bigger Questions Unanswered by David Eade		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/court-halts-vaccine-policy-overhaul-leaving-bigger-questions-unanswered/#comment-177557</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Eade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86268#comment-177557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I   have a question. So the judge who &quot;halted&quot; the &quot;Update&quot; has no knowledge of vaccines, no scientific point to his validation and is therefore choosing to use a &quot;legal loophole&quot; to stop the $$$ from which I   would bet my entire life savings that he/she has specifically received funding via NGO to run for their current position.  ( I  know it!)  With that being said, what legal argument can be made for halting the change?  If the judge halts the CDCs determination then on what basis is he/she doing so?  (Is that basis on &quot;safety&quot;- ie hypothesis that loss of vaccines would cause greater child hood deaths?) If the legal decision is based on a &quot;fallacy&quot; then not only has the judge stepped outside their boundary but they are now interfering with a federal branch of the government who have scoured through the medical data, and re-established the &quot;dangers&quot; of the advanced schedule as it may cause more harm.  In other words the judge is clearly putting themselves in between efficacy and opinion!  (There are no substantiative data results that can validate their opinion especially if you have watched the hearings with Attorney Ali who argued on behalf of the vaccinated!  (Brilliant man who read all the data by the way!). Please help me understand?  Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I   have a question. So the judge who &#8220;halted&#8221; the &#8220;Update&#8221; has no knowledge of vaccines, no scientific point to his validation and is therefore choosing to use a &#8220;legal loophole&#8221; to stop the $$$ from which I   would bet my entire life savings that he/she has specifically received funding via NGO to run for their current position.  ( I  know it!)  With that being said, what legal argument can be made for halting the change?  If the judge halts the CDCs determination then on what basis is he/she doing so?  (Is that basis on &#8220;safety&#8221;- ie hypothesis that loss of vaccines would cause greater child hood deaths?) If the legal decision is based on a &#8220;fallacy&#8221; then not only has the judge stepped outside their boundary but they are now interfering with a federal branch of the government who have scoured through the medical data, and re-established the &#8220;dangers&#8221; of the advanced schedule as it may cause more harm.  In other words the judge is clearly putting themselves in between efficacy and opinion!  (There are no substantiative data results that can validate their opinion especially if you have watched the hearings with Attorney Ali who argued on behalf of the vaccinated!  (Brilliant man who read all the data by the way!). Please help me understand?  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The Big Six Barriers: The Hidden Forces Suppressing Natural Health in America by Richard		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-big-six-barriers-the-hidden-forces-suppressing-natural-health-in-america/#comment-177542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86263#comment-177542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe that the biggest problem is that so much of our government decisions are monetized. It is how our elections are funded. When interest groups contribute to our elected officials campaigns, they expect something in return.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the biggest problem is that so much of our government decisions are monetized. It is how our elections are funded. When interest groups contribute to our elected officials campaigns, they expect something in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The New GMO Wave You Won’t Be Told About by Terese Farrar		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-new-gmo-wave-you-wont-be-told-about/#comment-176902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terese Farrar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86203#comment-176902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I first realized I was gluten intolerant when I got woke up after a supper with a hamburger bun and couldn&#039;t sleep for two+hours.  Depends on the meal as to whether I got sleep or not and the time I  didn&#039;t sleep.   It took longer to figure out dairy intolerance as I grew up on a dairy farm with whole milk and no pasteurization. 
I really look forward to having to decifer more labels!  NOT]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first realized I was gluten intolerant when I got woke up after a supper with a hamburger bun and couldn&#8217;t sleep for two+hours.  Depends on the meal as to whether I got sleep or not and the time I  didn&#8217;t sleep.   It took longer to figure out dairy intolerance as I grew up on a dairy farm with whole milk and no pasteurization.<br />
I really look forward to having to decifer more labels!  NOT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The New GMO Wave You Won’t Be Told About by Connie Beck		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-new-gmo-wave-you-wont-be-told-about/#comment-176795</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Beck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 22:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86203#comment-176795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There’s already an upswing of inflammatory disorders - this will just create more.  What’s wrong with having just ‘plain ole food’ to eat - why all the experimentation - nobody benefits except the ones selling. Can’t believe Paleo is going for this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s already an upswing of inflammatory disorders &#8211; this will just create more.  What’s wrong with having just ‘plain ole food’ to eat &#8211; why all the experimentation &#8211; nobody benefits except the ones selling. Can’t believe Paleo is going for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The New GMO Wave You Won’t Be Told About by Rose Carey		</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-new-gmo-wave-you-wont-be-told-about/#comment-176731</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rose Carey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 12:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=86203#comment-176731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I STRONGLY AGREE THAT WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW HOW WE RECEIVED OUR FOOD&#039;S AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT WAS DONE BY OTHER HUMAN TO DO ANYTHING THAT CHANGED OUR FOOD&#039;S IN ANY WAY FROM THE WAY GOD ARRIGIONALLY GAVE THEM TO US.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I STRONGLY AGREE THAT WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW HOW WE RECEIVED OUR FOOD&#8217;S AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT WAS DONE BY OTHER HUMAN TO DO ANYTHING THAT CHANGED OUR FOOD&#8217;S IN ANY WAY FROM THE WAY GOD ARRIGIONALLY GAVE THEM TO US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
