<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Facts About Supplements | Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anh-usa.org/tag/facts-about-supplements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anh-usa.org</link>
	<description>ANH Protects Free Speech About Natural Health Modalities, Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy, Homeopathy and Access To Natural Therapies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 19:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Pharma Pirates Creating CBD Monopoly (With FDA Assistance)</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/pharma-pirates-creating-cbd-monopoly-with-fda-assistance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pharma-pirates-creating-cbd-monopoly-with-fda-assistance</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/pharma-pirates-creating-cbd-monopoly-with-fda-assistance/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The ANH Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=63272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Action Alert</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/pharma-pirates-creating-cbd-monopoly-with-fda-assistance/">Pharma Pirates Creating CBD Monopoly (With FDA Assistance)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/srQeAEoH1cI" width="700" height="394" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><br />
<a href="https://anh-usa.org/action-alert-tell-congress-to-save-cbd-oil/"><strong>Action Alert</strong></a></p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/pharma-pirates-creating-cbd-monopoly-with-fda-assistance/">Pharma Pirates Creating CBD Monopoly (With FDA Assistance)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/pharma-pirates-creating-cbd-monopoly-with-fda-assistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dietary Supplement 4-MU (4-Methylumbelliferone) is an Effective Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Agent for Prostate Cancer</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/the-dietary-supplement-4-mu-4-methylumbelliferone-is-an-effective-chemopreventive-and-therapeutic-agent-for-prostate-cancer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-dietary-supplement-4-mu-4-methylumbelliferone-is-an-effective-chemopreventive-and-therapeutic-agent-for-prostate-cancer</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/the-dietary-supplement-4-mu-4-methylumbelliferone-is-an-effective-chemopreventive-and-therapeutic-agent-for-prostate-cancer/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 19:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=63844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How 4-MU can help keep prostate and other cancers in check. &#160; Just in case any of us think the title of this can’t be so, it must be nonsense—a dietary supplement that effectively prevents and treats prostate cancer—this was and is the title of an article published in the Journal of the National Cancer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/the-dietary-supplement-4-mu-4-methylumbelliferone-is-an-effective-chemopreventive-and-therapeutic-agent-for-prostate-cancer/">The Dietary Supplement 4-MU (4-Methylumbelliferone) is an Effective Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Agent for Prostate Cancer</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>How 4-MU can help keep prostate and other cancers in check.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
Just in case any of us think the title of this can’t be so, it must be nonsense—a dietary supplement that effectively prevents and treats prostate cancer—this was and is the title of an article published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (“JNCI”) in 2015. Yes, that’s the Journal of the National Cancer Institute of these United States, supported by taxes paid by you and me, and of course the printing presses (electronic and otherwise) at the Federal Reserve Bank.<br />
So that was 2015…why haven’t we seen this dietary supplement for sale in our health food stores, compounding pharmacies, on-line, or at the Tahoma Clinic Dispensary? Why—in 2017—would any of us be forced to go overseas to buy a safe, natural product which the Journal of the National Cancer Institute told us in 2015 is “an effective chemopreventive and therapeutic agent for prostate cancer,” especially when the same JNCI article tells us that “4-MU is…non-toxic”?<br />
It’s likely you already know the answer to that…so let’s review the findings reported in this and other research publications concerning 4-MU (the short name for 4-methylumbelliferone). The researchers worked with mice deliberately bred to develop prostate cancer and prostate cancer metastases at mouse puberty, which is (for these mice) twenty-eight weeks of age. Technically, these mice are termed “TRAMP” mice and no kidding, the prostate cancers they develop are considered to “closely mirror the pathogenesis of human prostate cancer.”<a href="#_edn2" name="_ednref2">[2]</a><br />
As expected, these mice all developed prostate cancer and metastases of prostate cancer at twenty-eight weeks. One group received a placebo; the other group were given 4-MU, 450 milligrams per kilogram per day. The researchers reported that both the original prostate cancers and metastases were “abrogated” (research-ese for eliminated) in the 4-MU treated group. The abstract of their publication concluded: “4-MU is an effective, non-toxic, oral chemopreventive and therapeutic agent that targets prostate cancer development, growth and metastasis…”<br />
The opening sentence to the full article said: “Effective control of localized prostate cancer and of its metastatic spread by consumption of a non-toxic dietary supplement can potentially delay/avoid treatment of low-risk localized prostate cancer and halt progression in patients with advanced disease. 4-MU is a dietary supplement consumed in Europe and Asia for improving liver health.”<br />
Prostate cancer isn’t the only cancer against which 4-MU has been reported effective. Ovarian cancer appears to be another possibility, as reported by Japanese researchers.<a href="#_edn3" name="_ednref3">[3]</a> Rats were “inoculated” with human ovarian cancer cells injected into their abdominal cavities. One group was then given a “carrier base” only, and the other group got 4-MU with the “carrier base.” All of the rats in the carrier-base-only group died in thirteen days. The rats in the 4-MU group were given this treatment for only fourteen days; then treatment was stopped; the researchers reported that survival time was significantly prolonged (p&lt;0.05 for the statistically inclined) in the 4-MU group even though 4-MU treatment had been stopped at fourteen days. Despite discontinuance, 4-MU also was reported to reduce dissemination of ovarian tumors throughout the rats’ abdomens, as well as reducing ascites (scientese for edema fluid in the abdomen). The researchers concluded: “…this is the first study to report an inhibitory effect of 4-MU on ovarian cancer.”<br />
Breast cancer is affected by 4-MU. Using human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231 for the technically inclined) grown in culture plates, researchers demonstrated that 4-MU “significantly inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis (cell death)…4-MU treatment also inhibited cell motility as well as cell invasiveness…” The human cancer cells were then injected into the bones of mice. In the group of mice treated with 4-MU, the invasion of the human cancer cells into the bones was significantly inhibited.<a href="#_edn4" name="_ednref4">[4]</a><br />
4-MU has also been reported to inhibit breast cancer cells in dogs.<a href="#_edn5" name="_ednref5">[5]</a> In the article abstract, the researchers wrote: “We examined the antitumor effect of 4-MU on CF41 mesenchymal-like canine mammary tumor cells…since 4-MU exhibits anti-tumor activity in mesenchymal-like cells, it may be a useful inhibitor of canine mammary tumor invasion and metastasis.”<br />
Osteosarcoma is a bone cancer which occurs most frequently in adolescents and young adults. Not infrequently, it metastasizes (often to the lungs) “colonizing” other areas away from its original location. Investigating osteosarcoma in mice, the researchers reported: “4-Methylumbelliferone is a promising therapeutic agent targeting both primary tumors and distant metastasis of osteosarcoma…”<a href="#_edn6" name="_ednref6">[6]</a><br />
Melanoma (a skin cancer) frequently metastasizes from the skin to elsewhere in the body. Once again working with mice (doing such research in humans isn’t ethical) researchers reported<a href="#_edn7" name="_ednref7">[7]</a>: “…4-methylumbelliferone has an inhibitory effect on the liver metastasis of…melanoma cells and therefore shows promise as an anti-metastatic agent.”<br />
Another research group wrote about squamous cell cancer of the esophagus, starting their report by writing: “Oesphageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor entity with at present poor prognosis…the median survival time [after diagnosis] is less than one year.” Once again, the “research subjects” were mice, about which the researchers wrote: “Treatment with 4-MU not only was associated with decreased tumor size, but also caused remarkable alterations in tumor morphology” (in English, the tumors in the 4-MU treated mice looked very different than tumors in mice not treated with 4-MU).<br />
Steve Jobs, founder of Apple Computers, and famous Hollywood actor Patrick Swayze died relatively rapidly from pancreatic cancer. “Conventional” treatment rarely cures pancreatic cancer, at best adding one or more months to a sufferer’s lifetime. (More than a century ago, Dr. Joseph Beard of the UK discovered the reason for this, but that’s a subject for another time.)<br />
In February 2017, another group of researchers reported about what happened to human pancreatic cancer cells (“MIA PaCa-2” cells for the technically inclined) and the tumors they formed in mice. The researchers reported<a href="#_edn8" name="_ednref8">[8]</a>: “A suspension of tumor cells was injected into the abdomens of mice. Tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into two groups that were treated with or without 4-MU…After 72 hours of treatment, 4-MU inhibited cell proliferation…4-MU also suppressed the amount of [cancer] cell migration and invasion…the percentage of apoptotic [self-destructed] cancer cells was significantly increased in cells treated with 4-MU…in conclusion, our findings show that 4-MU had anti-cancer properties in a [human] pancreatic cancer cell line and improved survival times in mice with pancreatic tumors. The results of our study suggested that 4-MU may have effectiveness as a novel anticancer agent for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.”<br />
<strong> </strong><br />
<strong>4-Methylumbelliferone (4-MU) Safety</strong><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Maybe it’s not safe? In addition to the statement in the JNCI article that 4-MU is effective and non-toxic, in 2015 another article was published concerning the safety of this dietary supplement,<a href="#_edn9" name="_ednref9">[9]</a> which is available over-the-counter in some (but not all) European countries where it goes by various names including “hymecromone” and “cantabaline.”Here are excerpts concerning safety of 4-methylumbelliferone (“4-MU”) from this second publication:<br />
“Several clinical trials in humans, including randomized placebo-controlled, have been published on hymecromone and all demonstrated excellent safety during short-term administration of approved doses…Taken together, at least 182 patients have been exposed in clinical trials and no serious adverse events from hymecromone were reported. The longest reported duration of administration of hymecromone was a multiple-dose study of oral administration of hymecromone(4-MU) at 1200 milligrams per day (400 mg three times/day) for three months in 20 participants with biliary dyskinesia…”<br />
The overall safety of hymecromone is further supported by animal data noted in the Italian Medicines Agency “package insert” which notes “acute toxicity has proved to be very low: the LD50 [the amount of a toxic agent sufficient to kill 50 percentof a population of animals] for oral administration is 7593 milligrams per kilogram [2.2 pounds] in mice and 6220 milligrams/kilogram in rats. Protracted oral administration in the range of 800–2400 milligrams/kilogram/day for three months,and in the rat 400–1000 milligrams/kilogram/day for four months has shown excellent tolerability…”<br />
“Taken together, the clinical experience to date suggests hymecromone is a safe and well-tolerated oral medication. The safety of oral hymecromone doses as high as 2400 mg/day and treatment durations as long as 3 months have been demonstrated in humans and can serve as a benchmark for early stage clinical trials exploring new indications.”<br />
<strong> </strong><br />
<strong>Availability and Use of 4-Methylumbelliferone </strong><br />
&nbsp;<br />
As the last part of this article is being written on the 4<sup>th</sup> of July 2017, where we are all encouraged to celebrate “freedom,” it’s sad to report that 4-methylumbelliferone, reported by researchers in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute to be “an effective, non-toxic oral chemopreventive and therapeutic agent” against prostate cancer is not freely available here in these United States. (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and all the other signers of the Declaration of Independence would be both sad and aghast!)<br />
However, 4-MU (labelled with a myriad of trade-names) can be purchased over-the-counter in Italy, Turkey, Greece, Germany, the United Kingdom and Russia. In Austria and Czechoslovakia, a prescription is required.<a href="#_edn10" name="_ednref10">[10]</a> It can also be purchased on-line as “4-MU-Pro™” at <a href="http://www.antiaging-systems.com">www.antiaging-systems.com</a> (Use the code 4MU-SP-20 until December 31, 2017 for a discount from the regular price.)<br />
Unfortunately, there are as yet no double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials in humans using 4-MU against prostate cancer. We can’t be sure there ever will be; it’s doubtful that any man diagnosed with prostate cancer would volunteer to be in the placebo group! So what do you do if you’re a man with prostate cancer? Of course, discuss this with a physician skilled and knowledgeable in natural medicine.<br />
What about dosages and for how long? Again, discuss with a physician skilled and knowledgeable in natural medicine, but keep in mind the safety and duration-of-treatment reports noted above in animals (“7593 milligrams per kilogram in mice and 6220 milligrams per kilogram in rats,”<sup>9</sup> but “only” 450 milligrams per kilogram per day given for 28 weeks in the successful JNCI prostate cancer study<sup>1</sup>) and humans (“the safety of oral hymecromone [4-MU] doses as high as 2400 milligrams per day and treatment durations as long as 3 months have been demonstrated in humans”<sup>9</sup>).<br />
If we use the JNCI “mouse dosages” of 450 milligrams per kilogram (2.2 pounds) for a 175 pound (79.5 kilogram) man, that’s almost 36 grams of 4-MU per day (likely split into three or four daily dosages) taken for 28 weeks, roughly four months. Once again, that’s a “heck of a lot” of 4-MU for quite a while. Discuss that with your physician skilled and knowledgeable in natural medicine, too!<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<a href="#_ednref1" name="_edn1"></a><strong>References:</strong><br />
&nbsp;<br />
[1]Lokeshwar V et al. <em>Dietary Supplement 4-Methylumbelliferone: An Effective Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Agent for Prostate Cancer</em>JNat Cancer Inst 2015;107(7) djv085<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<a href="#_ednref2" name="_edn2">[2]</a>Hurwitz AA et al. <em>The TRAMP mouse as a model for prostate cancer.</em>CurrProtocImmunol 2001: Chapter 20:Unit 20.5<br />
<strong> </strong><br />
<a href="#_ednref3" name="_edn3">[3]</a>Tamura R, et al. <em>4-Methylumbelliferone inhibits ovarian cancer growth by suppressing thymidine phophorylase expression. </em>Journal of Ovarian Research 2014;7:94<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<a href="#_ednref4" name="_edn4">[4]</a>Urakawa H, et al. <em>4-Methylumbelliferone suppresses tumorigenicity in vitro and metastatic lesions of bone in vivo-</em>Int J Cancer 2012;130:454-466<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<a href="#_ednref5" name="_edn5">[5]</a>Saito T et al <em>The hyaluronan synthesis inhibitor 4-methylumbelliferoneexhibits antitumor effects against mesenchymal-like  canine mammary tumor cells </em>Oncology Letters 2013;5:1068-1074<br />
<a href="#_ednref6" name="_edn6"></a><br />
[6] Arai E et al. <em>Inhibition of hyaluronan retention by 4-methylubelliferone suppresses osteosarcoma cells in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo. </em>Brit J Cancer 2011;105:1839-1849<br />
<a href="#_ednref7" name="_edn7"></a><br />
[7]Yoshihara S et al. <em>A hyaluronan synthase suppressor, 4-methylumbelliferone, inhibits liver metastasis of melanoma cells. </em>FEBS Letters 579; 2005: 2722-2726<br />
<a href="#_ednref8" name="_edn8"></a><br />
[8]Nagase H et al. <em>4-methylumbelliferone suppresses hyaluronan synthesis and tumor progression in SCID mice intra-abdominally injected with pancreatic cancer cells. </em>Pancreas 2017<br />
<a href="#_ednref9" name="_edn9"></a><br />
[9]Nagy N et al.<em>4-Methylumbelliferone treatmentandhyaluronan inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in inflammation, autoimmTunity, and cancer.</em>FrontImmunol 2015;6:123<br />
<a href="#_ednref10" name="_edn10"></a><br />
[10]https://biomonde.org/contact/contacts.htm<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/the-dietary-supplement-4-mu-4-methylumbelliferone-is-an-effective-chemopreventive-and-therapeutic-agent-for-prostate-cancer/">The Dietary Supplement 4-MU (4-Methylumbelliferone) is an Effective Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Agent for Prostate Cancer</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/the-dietary-supplement-4-mu-4-methylumbelliferone-is-an-effective-chemopreventive-and-therapeutic-agent-for-prostate-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Genetic Defect We All Share—The Human Need for Vitamin C</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/a-genetic-defect-we-all-share-the-human-need-for-vitamin-c/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-genetic-defect-we-all-share-the-human-need-for-vitamin-c</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/a-genetic-defect-we-all-share-the-human-need-for-vitamin-c/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regenerative Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=63425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>  Animals show us why we need vitamin C How much vitamin C is needed daily for optimal health? How much vitamin C should we take every day? Can’t we get enough of this nutrient from orange juice? It’s not widely known that the answer to these questions is found in textbooks of human genetics, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/a-genetic-defect-we-all-share-the-human-need-for-vitamin-c/">A Genetic Defect We All Share—The Human Need for Vitamin C</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Animals show us why we need vitamin C</li>
<li>How much vitamin C is needed daily for optimal health?</li>
</ul>
<p>How much vitamin C should we take every day? Can’t we get enough of this nutrient from orange juice? It’s not widely known that the answer to these questions is found in textbooks of human genetics, not just in textbooks of nutrition. That makes the answer a little long, but it’s definitely worth knowing!<br />
An ever-increasing number of studies report the benefits of vitamin C supplementation. As encouraging as these reports are, they’re still looking at “details” instead of the “big picture,” or as the cliché goes, “not looking at the forest because of the trees.” As textbooks of human genetics, pediatrics, and internal medicine all tell us, the human requirement for vitamin C is not strictly a matter of nutrition, but rather a basic genetic defect, a biochemical inability to manufacture vitamin C internally that all humans share.<br />
Vitamin C is synthesized internally by all species of animals, excepting only chimpanzees, monkeys and other “primate” species, guinea pigs, an obscure bat found only in India, and humans. Cats, dogs, elephants, birds, horses, cows&#8230;. nearly all other species need no vitamin C in their diets at all! Nearly all other animals synthesize vitamin C internally, from glucose (blood sugar) by an identical-to-all-species series of four enzymes. When stressed in any way, all other animals immediately start to self-manufacture greatly increased quantities of vitamin C to combat that stress.<br />
Human liver cells contain the first three enzymes in the vitamin C synthesizing series, but the fourth enzyme is totally missing! When humans are stressed, the activity of those first three enzymes is greatly increased, but no vitamin C is produced since that fourth enzyme is missing from humans. Unlike animals, we are genetically prevented from producing one of the most important anti-stress and detoxifying molecules present in all of nature, vitamin C. The human need for vitamin C is an “inborn error of metabolism,” a fortunately survivable genetic disease, and not just a nutritional problem. This fact must be included in the “big picture” concerning vitamin C and optimal health. It’s obvious to those who take this approach that we’d all be considerably healthier, and live longer, if we didn’t all have this genetic problem.<br />
When animals ingest carcinogens, their bodies immediately start to synthesize ten, twenty, fifty times as much vitamin C to help detoxify and get rid of the carcinogen. Human bodies “try” to make more vitamin C, but can’t.<br />
When animals are injured, their bodies synthesize much more vitamin C to aid in tissue repair. (Vitamin C is key to the synthesis of collagen in “connective tissue”). Human bodies “try,” but can’t.<br />
When animals are given drugs of any kind (including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine) their bodies synthesize much more vitamin C until the drugs are detoxified. Human bodies “try,” but can’t.<br />
I could go on and on with examples but our space is limited. To summarize: when other animals start to become ill in any way, their bodies begin to synthesize much more vitamin C in an effort to head off the illness, and to shorten it or at least lessen the symptoms over time if it occurs.<br />
One human study (which in a very practical way “summarizes” all of this and more) demonstrated that longevity is increased by daily supplementation of vitamin C, six years for the men involved, and one year for the women. Since this study was started when the participants were in middle age or older, it’s very likely that results would be much better if vitamin C supplementation was started at birth!<br />
Mainstream medicine is actively in favor of treating all other genetic diseases to the maximum extent possible, but (for mostly political reasons) is silent on the subject of full correction of this one. Fortunately, we can (and should) take care of it on our own. And it’s easy: just take supplemental vitamin C! What little is present in our food is enough to prevent death from scurvy (a total lack of vitamin C), but not nearly enough to produce maximum health benefits.<br />
A few scientists who’ve seriously studied this question point out that on an “equivalent-weight” basis with animals that synthesize their own vitamin C, healthy adult humans would (if not for our genetic defect) produce from 2 to 4 grams of vitamin C daily. Other scientists have observed that adult gorillas (another non-vitamin C synthesizing species) living in an area identical to the “original” human environment eat approximately 3 to 4 grams vitamin C daily (calculated on a human-weight basis).<br />
These comparisons give us general guidelines about appropriate supplemental quantities, but since we’re all individuals, I recommend an individualized approach, using “feedback” from our own bodies. Popularized by Linus Pauling Ph.D as the “bowel-tolerance” approach, it’s quite simple. Slowly increase the amount of supplemental vitamin C each day until we start getting excess gas or loose bowels. At that point, our bodies are very likely not able to use that quantity, so “back off” to the largest amount tolerable without producing “loose bowels” or excess gas. Most adults I work with find the “tolerance point” to be 3 to 6 grams daily. However, when illness occurs, the tolerance point frequently increases to 20 to 30 grams or more daily, showing that our bodies “need the extra help” when we’re ill. Occasionally, people who’ve had severe viral illness have told me they’ve taken up to 100 grams daily for a day or two without any bowel problems at all.<br />
Since vitamin C is water-soluble and rapidly used by our bodies, it’s logical to “spread it out” to at least two or three intervals daily when we’re healthy, and as often as hourly when we’re ill.<br />
To “download” for free a much more complete explanation of “bowel tolerance” dosing, “go to”<br />
<a href="http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1981/pdf/1981-v10n02-p125.pdf">http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1981/pdf/1981-v10n02-p125.pdf</a><br />
There’s just one definite precaution about daily vitamin C use: individuals who have formed calcium oxalate kidney stones, or who come from families who’ve had them, should limit supplemental vitamin C to 1 gram daily unless they’re working with a health care professional knowledgeable in nutritional therapy.<br />
There’s a very remote possibility that more vitamin C will increase the production of oxalate in those individuals. Fortunately, it’s easy to test for this possibility. If found—remember, this circumstance is rare—it’s also possible to prevent these extremely rare potential cases of vitamin C-induced calcium oxalate kidney stones.</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/a-genetic-defect-we-all-share-the-human-need-for-vitamin-c/">A Genetic Defect We All Share—The Human Need for Vitamin C</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/a-genetic-defect-we-all-share-the-human-need-for-vitamin-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frederick R. Klenner M.D., The Originator of Successful High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C Therapy</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/frederick-r-klenner-m-d-the-originator-of-successful-high-dose-intravenous-vitamin-c-therapy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=frederick-r-klenner-m-d-the-originator-of-successful-high-dose-intravenous-vitamin-c-therapy</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/frederick-r-klenner-m-d-the-originator-of-successful-high-dose-intravenous-vitamin-c-therapy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=63422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>  How IV vitamin C can help treat viral diseases and other maladies. &#160; Frederick Klenner graduated from Duke University School of Medicine in 1936. After three years of hospital training he entered the private practice of medicine in Reidsville, North Carolina. His main subspecialty was diseases of the chest, but he became interested in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/frederick-r-klenner-m-d-the-originator-of-successful-high-dose-intravenous-vitamin-c-therapy/">Frederick R. Klenner M.D., The Originator of Successful High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C Therapy</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>How IV vitamin C can help treat viral diseases and other maladies.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
Frederick Klenner graduated from Duke University School of Medicine in 1936. After three years of hospital training he entered the private practice of medicine in Reidsville, North Carolina. His main subspecialty was diseases of the chest, but he became interested in the use of massive doses of vitamin C in the treatment of virus diseases and other illnesses as well. He inspired Linus Pauling and Irwin Stone to expand the research on the great benefits of vitamin C. Dr. Klenner died in 1984.<br />
He believed in the healing power of nature, but believed that natural remedies could enhance that power and were safer and usually more effective than drugs. In 1948, he published his first paper on the use of large doses of vitamin C in the treatment of viral diseases. He believed anyone who is ill “should get large doses of Vitamin C in all pathological conditions while the physician ponders the diagnosis.”<br />
The idea that anyone who is ill should take (or be given) large doses of vitamin C even before a diagnosis is made is “sheer quackery” to mainstream physicians and State Medical Boards, all of whom believe that treatment of illness should follow diagnosis. But Dr. Klenner was 100% correct: vitamin C treatment should start whenever any illness starts! (An explanation is in paragraphs two through seven of the article printed on page 1.)<br />
How does vitamin C work? In massive amounts such as, 5-150 grams, intravenously, for certain pathological conditions, if allowed to run in rapidly it acts as a “flash oxidizer” and may correct the condition in minutes. It also can be a reducing agent. It neutralized toxins, viruses, and histamine. The more serious the condition, the more C is required. It appears that vitamin C not only acts as a reducing agent, but also an oxidizing agent, an anti-clotting agent, an antihistamine, and as an anti-infective agent.<br />
Dr. Klenner was the first to successfully use high-dose vitamin C in viral diseases, including polio. Dr. Smith explains<sup>2</sup>: ascorbic acid enters all cells. Dr. Klenner wrote: After vitamin C has entered cells infected by viruses, vitamin C “proceeds to take up the protein coats being manufactured by the virus nucleic acid, thus preventing the assembly of new virus units.” Some infected cells expand, rupture, and die, but there are no virus particles available to enter and infect new cells. If a virus has invaded a cell, the vitamin C contributes to its breakdown.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Dr. Klenner’s Successful Treatment of Polio</strong><br />
In polio, vitamin C destroys the virus. It also acts as a diuretic, removing the polio-caused edema of the brain, preventing compression of the cells lining the nervous system. If not relieved by the diuretic action of high-dose vitamin C, the swollen, infected tissue would create pressure in the unyielding bony vault cutting off the blood supply to the motor cells. The paralysis of polio would follow.<br />
Dr. Klenner reported a case of a five year-old girl with polio and paralysis of both legs accompanied by knee and back pain. Massage was given along with vitamin C by injection. Within four days she was able to move both legs. She was sent home to continue the vitamin C orally at 1000 mg every two hours. She walked by the eleventh day; the vitamin was stopped and B<sub>1</sub> begun, only ten milligrams four times each day. She was completely well by the 19th day after treatment had been started. Another polio case presented with 104.4° temperature (measured in the armpit) severe headache, red eyes, vomiting and tightness in the hamstrings. Two grams of vitamin C was given intravenously immediately and again in two hours; then every four hours for 48 hours. In six hours after the first intravenous dose, his temperature had fallen to 100°, his eyes cleared up, he was jovial, sitting and drinking fluids. After that, Dr. Klenner stopped the intravenous treatments and had him take 1500 mg of vitamin C by mouth every two hours for a week. After that, the vitamin C was discontinued, and Dr. Klenner asked him to take 25 milligrams of vitamin B<sub>1</sub> (thiamine) four times a day to help restore nerve function. Dr. Klenner wrote that vitamin B<sub>1</sub> should be continued for a period of at least three months because nerve tissue is slow to recover.<br />
In another article about viruses in 1949 (Southern Medicine and Surgery, vol. 111, #7, July) Dr. Klenner stated his frustration that mainstream researchers didn’t recognize the cause of their failure in treating viral diseases with vitamin C; they did not give big enough doses frequently enough. He wrote about an “unbelievable” record of failed studies in the ten years before he wrote this article.<br />
He concentrated on the response of poliomyelitis to vitamin C. He knew that the virus was floating about in the blood stream and that large doses of vitamin C would destroy the virus before it got to the nervous system. Dr. Klenner reviewed the literature because he was having consistent, positive responses with vitamin C; he was encouraged when he read that some investigators had discovered low levels of C in the urine of humans and animals when infected with the polio virus. He felt there was a “relationship between the degree of Vitamin C saturation and the infectious and noninfectious state.” He mentioned an Australian researcher who demonstrated a “correlation between the severity of the polio attack and the level of urinary excretion of the vitamin.…deficiency of Vitamin C in the diet predisposed to infection and to the severity of the attack.”<br />
He also cited a 1937 report about polio treatment in monkeys. If vitamin C was given during the viral incubation stage, the polio was much less severe. But if the disease was in its fifth day, much larger doses of C were required. Even when only 100 mg of C were given in 24 hours to these experimental monkeys, there were six times the number of non-paralytic survivors as in the control group which received no vitamin C.<br />
Dr. Sabin (the developer of the “oral” polio vaccine) attempted to discredit the use of vitamin C in controlling polio in monkeys but did not give enough (only 100 milligrams, once) to make any difference. As might have been predicted, these monkeys developed unmodified polio. Dr. Klenner wrote: “Thousands of children owe their paralyzed limbs to this unfortunate blunder of Sabin.”<br />
Dr. Klenner adopted a routine injection schedule for children with early symptoms of polio: 1000 to 2000 milligrams (depending on age) to start. (Intramuscular injections were used for children under four years old.) If fever dropped in two hours, two more hours was allowed before the second dose. After 24 hours, if the fever remained down, this same dose was given every six hours for the next 48 hours. All sixty cases of polio treated this way were well in 72 hours. Three had a relapse, so the injections of vitamin C for another two days every eight to twelve hours. Two of the 60 patients had throat muscle paralysis and needed oxygen and drainage but were recovering in 36 hours.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Hepatitis Cured</strong><br />
Polio is only one of many viral illnesses Dr. Klenner successfully treated with injections of high dose vitamin C. Here are reports of successful hepatitis treatment. (Unfortunately, the type of hepatitis—A, B, or C—wasn’t specified.)<br />
“A 27 year old male with 103° temperature, nausea and jaundice of three days. 60 grams of sodium ascorbate in 600 cc of normal saline was given intravenously at 120 drops/minute. Five grams of Vitamin C was given orally every four hours around the clock. Fifteen grams of C was again given three hours after the first I.V. Another 60 grams of C was given intravenously twelve hours after the initial one (he used 5% glucose in water this time). That one took 75 minutes to accomplish. Then another fifteen grams of C intravenously after two more hours.<br />
“For the 30 hours of treatment he received 270 grams intravenously and 45 grams orally—no diarrhea. Temperature was normal at this time and urine clear of bile. Discharged from the hospital, he was back to work. Vitamin C sets in as a flash oxidizer and helps the body manufacture interferon, a natural antiviral agent.”<br />
“A 22 year old male with chills and fever and a diagnosis of viral hepatitis. His roommate had been admitted the day before. Fifteen grams of sodium ascorbate was given intravenously every twelve hours for three days, then once daily for six days. Sodium ascorbate was swallowed at five grams every four hours (135 grams intravenously, and 180 grams orally). No diarrhea appeared with these doses. He was sent home on the sixth day with no fever and no bile in the urine. Soon he was back to work. His roommate with just bed rest was in the hospital for 26 days!”<br />
“Another male contracted hepatitis in Central America. There, he got lemon juice orally and rectally. Hot mud packs were placed over his liver. He had 104° degree temperature and was sent home. He was told to try bed rest and a protein diet. When Dr. Klenner saw him, he was jaundiced, temperature = 101° and had a very large tender liver. His I.V. was 30 grams sodium ascorbate and one gram calcium gluconate. Oral vitamin C: five grams every four hours around the clock for three days. 400 mg adenosine injected intramuscularly.<br />
[The injectable form of adenosine, a safe—if used properly—substance found in humans and other living creatures has been banned by <em>los federales</em> during the last decade]. 100,000 IU of Vitamin Apalmitate were given daily. On the fourth day he got 70 grams ascorbate intravenously and one gram calcium. On the sixth day, he got another 70 grams intravenously, and on the seventh day the bilirubin in the serum was down to 1.9 compared to 98 on the first day; SGOT [a liver enzyme that rises with liver inflammation and infection] had fallen from 450 to 45. At home he took fifteen grams of C orally, 1,400 mg of choline three times a day plus a high protein and carbohydrate diet—no sequelae.<br />
“A 42-year-old male suffering from chronic hepatitis had been unsuccessfully treated with steroids for seven months. He was given B complex and Vitamin C: 45 grams of sodium ascorbate plus one gram of calcium gluconate in 500 cc of water with 5% glucose was given intravenously three times a week. He took five grams of C orally every four hours. He was free of the disease in five months.” Dr. Klenner felt if he had more massive and continuous doses in the hospital he would have been well in a few weeks, but his peers on the staff would have denied the patient this safe treatment.<br />
Dr. Klenner reemphasized the point, “Sodium ascorbate in amounts ranging up to 900 mg per kilogram body weight every eight to twelve hours will effect cures in two to four days.” Adenosine, 400 to 1,200 mg. intramuscularly, daily.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Other Viral Illnesses</strong><br />
Dr. Klenner successfully treated many other viral illnesses—including herpes simplex, herpes zoster, measles, mumps, mononucleosis, and chicken pox—always with high-dose vitamin C, and often in conjunction with other vitamins and nutrients. He treated his own daughter’s chicken pox, and gave us this case report which pointed out that injected vitamin C is often more effective than vitamin C taken orally.<br />
After she developed chicken pox, she was swallowing vitamin C at twenty-four grams daily, but papules spread and the itch was intense. After one gram of C intravenously, the itch stopped and she slept well for eight hours. A new I.V. was then given and no new rash appeared. (Untreated chicken pox victims break out for five full days). He noted this ability of injectable C to terminate the usual progress of virus diseases. He wrote that one to three injections of 400 milligrams per kilogram (2.2 pounds) every eight hours will dry up chicken pox in twenty-fourhours. As injected vitamin C often causes thirst, he recommended drinking water adequately before injections are given.<br />
Dr. Klenner reported successful treatment of serious cases of measles: “A ten month old baby had the high fever, watery nose, dry cough, the red eyes, and the Koplik spots that gave the disease away: hard measles.” He gave 1000 milligram injections of vitamin C every four hours. After twelve hours the temperature had fallen to 97.5°; the cough had stopped and the redness of the membranes had cleared. Just to see if this improvement happened to be the natural course of the disease, the injected vitamin C was stopped for eight hours. The fever rose to 103.4°. The vitamin C injections were resumed and the fever dropped in a few hours to 99°. 1000 mg was given every four hours; no rash developed.<br />
In another case, an eight-year-old developed measles and mumps closely followed by encephalitis [inflammation in the brain].“ Temperature was 104°. He could not eat, was stuporous and responded only to pain. Two hours after one injection of 2000 mg of Vitamin C, he sat up, ate a hearty meal and then played. In six hours he started to revert to his previous stupor, and the fever returned. Twelve hours after a second injection of 2000 milligrams, and 1000 mg every two hours by mouth, he recovered.”<br />
Vitamin C also was effective against mumps: A 23-year-old male developed mumps plus bilateral orchitis [swelling of the testicles]; his fever was 105°, and he was in overwhelming pain with “testicles the size of tennis balls.” After one 1000-mg injection of vitamin C intravenously the pain began to subside and after six more shots spaced every two hours the pain was gone. The fever was normal in 36 hours. He was up, about and well in 60 hours. Total dose of vitamin C was 25,000 milligrams.<br />
Dr. Klenner reported that mononucleosis can be eliminated with intravenous vitamin C in just a few days, and that the more intravenous vitamin C given, the quicker the recovery. In one patient who was given the last rites by her church, the girl’s mother took things into her own hands when the attending physician refused to give ascorbic acid. In each bottle of I.V. fluid she would secretly and quickly “tap in” 20 -30 grams of vitamin C. The patient made an uneventful recovery. Her mother was a nurse.<br />
“Mainstream” medicine might argue that vaccinations to prevent viral disease are preferable to “waiting for the disease to occur” and then treating with intravenous vitamin C, even if it is successful. The report of effective treatment of mononucleosis—against which there is no successful vaccine—makes it obvious that antiviral treatment with vitamin C is still a useful tool. It’s also well known that vaccination is not 100% effective, and that some individuals and families prefer not to be vaccinated.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Vitamin C Effectively (and Safely) Treats Heavy Metal Toxicity, Other Toxins, and Poisons</strong><br />
Dr. Klenner reported that heavy metal poisonings, especially lead and mercury, are controlled with vitamin C injections and oral intake. He points out once again that large doses are needed. He reported that that the amount of vitamin C used “in any case is the all important factor. In 28 years of research we have observed that 30 grams each day is critical in terms of response” regardless of age and weight.<br />
He reported that in cases of lead poisoning, 350 milligrams of vitamin C per one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of body weight [which would be nearly 24 grams in a 150 pound individual] taken intramuscularly every two to four hours would enable recovery in less than 72 hours.<br />
Here are summaries of effective vitamin C treatment of a variety of toxic exposures and poisonings:<br />
An accidental carbon monoxide poisoning was reversed in ten minutes with 12 grams of ascorbic acid injected intravenously.<br />
Two boys were sprayed with a pesticide; one received injected vitamin C (10 grams) every eight hours and went home on the second day. The other boy was given only fluids; his skin showed a bad chemical burn; he died on the fifth day.<br />
Dr. Klenner reported that intravenous vitamin C was effective in eight cases of black widow spider bite. Here’s one case: A three and a half year old patient had been getting worse for 24 hours with abdominal cramps which the parents assumed were due to food poisoning. She became quieter, feverish, constipated, and her abdomen was exquisitely tender. She was becoming stuporous. Dr. Klenner noted the red, swollen area around her naval, and two tiny spots about one eighth of an inch apart were noted in the middle: the fang marks of a black widow spider. Dr. Klenner gave her one gram of calcium gluconate and 4 grams of vitamin C intravenously. In 6 hours she was more responsive, and her temperature had dropped from 103°to 101°. She was given another four grams intravenously. In another six hours, her temperature was 100°, and she could swallow fluids. The next day she was active, and 50% of the discoloration had disappeared. She received another 4 grams of C intravenously and 3 grams intramuscularly. At home she swallowed one gram of C every three to four hours. An enema produced a bloody return. When she recovered, she remembered brushing “a big black bug off her stomach,” before she took ill.<br />
An eighteen-year-old girl was treated just twenty minutes after a hornet bite. She was covered with hives and had shortness of breath and difficulty swallowing. In minutes after twelve grams of sodium ascorbate intravenously were pushed in with a 50 cc syringe her allergic symptoms were gone.<br />
He reported on a four-year-old girl bitten by a highland moccasin snake. She had severe pain in her leg and was vomiting within twenty minutes after the bite. Dr. Klenner gave four grams of C intravenously and within half an hour she had stopped crying and could now drink orangeade and began to laugh. “I’m all right now.” She slept well all night, but because of a slight fever and tenderness, Dr. Klenner gave her another four grams intravenously and again that late afternoon. No antibiotics and no anti-serum were necessary.<br />
Dr. Klenner told us about research reported in 1938 that led him to try vitamin C against toxins. In test tubes at human body temperature, vitamin C inactivates certain toxins at a very rapid rate. The more toxin in the tube, the faster the C disappears.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Food Poisoning—My Own Case</strong><br />
There’s just not room to mention all the other poisonings, toxicities, and inflammatory conditions successfully treated by Dr. Klenner with high doses of injectable vitamin C. However, I will mention my own experience with intravenous vitamin C treatment of food poisoning. It started at 9 AM with severe nausea, vomiting, and repeated diarrhea. Holly drove us to Tahoma Clinic; shortly before 10 AM a 50 gram IV was started. It finished “dripping in” by 10:40; by 11:30 all symptoms—no, not kidding—all symptoms were gone.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Vitamin C Use In Pregnancy, Infancy</strong><br />
Although most of this article has been about Dr. Klenner’s use of injectable vitamin C for illnesses, Dr. Klenner was of course an advocate of daily “at-home” use of vitamin C to stay as healthy as possible. (Remember, daily use is actually “making up for” a proven genetic defect shared by all humans.) There’s just space for one of the best examples: vitamin C during pregnancy and infancy.<br />
Dr. Klenner found in his investigation of over 300 pregnancies that the stress of the condition pushed the needs for C in women up to 15 grams a day. The human fetus is a “parasite” draining available C from the mother. We are all different and our needs for vitamin C vary depending upon heredity, environment, stress—or its perception. He reminds us of Roger Williams’ research in 1968 showing that some guinea pigs needed twenty times more vitamin C than others to maintain their health. (The usual dose recommended by Dr. Klenner for pregnant humans: 4 grams daily in the first trimester; 6 grams daily in the second trimester; 8 to 10 grams in the third trimester). He obtained excellent results with these large doses of C in women who had recurrent miscarriage. One woman had had five miscarriages and then with the vitamin C went on to have two normal pregnancies.<br />
Dr. Klenner wrote that German research reports many cases of these good results during pregnancies: Hemoglobin was easier to maintain, leg cramps were less (vitamin C enhances iron and calcium and magnesium absorption). “Stretch marks” of pregnancy were seldom encountered. Labor was shorter and less painful, no after-childbirth bleeding was reported. The perineum (the area between the vaginal and anal openings) was more elastic and if vitamin C was maintained, it continued to remain firm. Infants are born robust with this vitamin C. None required resuscitation. Fifty milligrams of ascorbic acid (orally, of course) was begun on the infant’s second day and was gradually increased as time went on.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>A Few Dr. Klenner Quotes</strong><br />
“Adults taking at least ten grams of ascorbic acid daily and children under ten at least one gram for each year of life will find that the brain will be clearer, the mind more active, the body less wearied, and the memory more retentive.”<br />
“I have never seen a patient that vitamin C would not benefit.”<br />
“Vitamin C should be given to the patient while the doctors ponder the diagnosis.”<strong> </strong><br />
<a href="#_ednref1" name="_edn1">[1]</a><sup>, 2 </sup>This article abstracted, adapted with (very small additions) from <em>The Clinical Experiences of Frederick R. Klenner, M.D., </em>by Lendon H. Smith, M.D. To read this article in full, “go to” <a href="https://www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/198x/smith-lh-clinical_guide_1988.htm">https://www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/198x/smith-lh-clinical_guide_1988.htm</a><br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/frederick-r-klenner-m-d-the-originator-of-successful-high-dose-intravenous-vitamin-c-therapy/">Frederick R. Klenner M.D., The Originator of Successful High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C Therapy</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/frederick-r-klenner-m-d-the-originator-of-successful-high-dose-intravenous-vitamin-c-therapy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expected New “Blockbuster” Alzheimer’s Drug</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/fda-attacking-supplements-to-boost-alzheimers-drug-sales/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fda-attacking-supplements-to-boost-alzheimers-drug-sales</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/fda-attacking-supplements-to-boost-alzheimers-drug-sales/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulse of Natural Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supplement Regulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=16774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Is this why brain supplements are suddenly under attack? Action Alerts! Does the FDA want to clear away competition for the new drug? This wouldn’t be the first time this has happened. Just as the first SSRI anti-depressant drug was coming out, the agency banned the amino acid tryptophan. The SSRIs prevented the body from [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/fda-attacking-supplements-to-boost-alzheimers-drug-sales/">Expected New “Blockbuster” Alzheimer’s Drug</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this why brain supplements are suddenly under attack? <em><strong><a href="https://anh-usa.org/action-alert-fda-attacks-picamilon/" target="_blank">Action Alerts!</a></strong></em><br />
Does the FDA want to clear away competition for the new drug?<br />
This wouldn’t be the first time this has happened. Just as the first SSRI anti-depressant drug was coming out, the agency banned the amino acid tryptophan. The SSRIs prevented the body from removing serotonin. Tryptophan is used by the body to make serotonin, so the natural supplement was seen as unwanted competition for the drug. The agency used a bad batch of the tryptophan made in Japan as its rather flimsy excuse. Years later, when SSRIs had made billions for drug companies, the agency allowed tryptophan again, but only in a more expensive formulation.<br />
At the present time, Eli Lilly has a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/21/investing/alzheimers-eli-lilly-drugs/"><strong>potential blockbuster drug</strong></a> for Alzheimer’s in the third and final phase of FDA trials. Currently called solanezumab, if approved it could bring in $7.6 billion in sales by 2024—and that might be a conservative estimate. This is despite evidence the drug doesn’t work that well, at least in later stages of the disease. But if it can be shown to have some benefit for the early stages, that could be enough to make it a huge moneymaker and turn around Eli Lilly’s earnings. The stock has already risen on the prospect. Biogen also has an Alzheimer’s drug in trials. The drug companies view Alzheimer’s as one of their very best potential markets.<br />
Meanwhile, natural therapies are already showing great promise against Alzheimer’s. We covered some of this <strong><a href="https://anh-usa.org/more-on-natural-substances-to-combat-alzheimers/">in an earlier article</a></strong>. Since then, Dale Bredesen, MD, who works at the Center for Alzheimer’s Disease Research at UCLA, has published <strong><a href="http://www.impactaging.com/papers/v6/n9/full/100690.html">a paper</a></strong> reporting success with natural therapies in treating nine out of ten patients. The thrust of Bredesen’s thesis is that as powerful as natural therapies are, they are even more powerful when individualized to the patient, an idea which is complete anathema to the drug companies and their allies at the FDA. More importantly, use of natural therapies could undercut potential drug profits.<br />
We regard all of this as important background for understanding two recent attacks on brain supplements. Ellen Rosenblum, the Oregon attorney general, and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) are at the moment leading the charge, but as you will see there is clear evidence the FDA is behind what the AG is doing. It is unlikely the senator would be moving without at least FDA approval.<br />
Unfortunately none of these people seem to have their facts straight. Let’s start with the Oregon AG.<br />
You will recall how recently the New York AG went after some herbs claiming they weren’t actually in the supplements sold. He got considerable egg on his face when it was shown that he had used the wrong test when assessing the supplements, and that scientists almost unanimously agreed that his conclusion were utterly incorrect.<br />
The Oregon AG apparently learned nothing from that fiasco. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/10/22/oregon-lawsuit-gnc-supplements/74344318/"><strong>According</strong></a> to <em>USA Today</em>, she has now filed a lawsuit alleging that “GNC, one of the world’s largest retailers of supposedly all-natural dietary supplements, has knowingly sold products spiked with two synthetic drugs.” The AG states that he is relying on an affidavit supplied by the FDA.<br />
There are two substances involved, BMPEA and picamilon. They are different and should not be lumped together. The FDA earlier sent <a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/oregon-sues-gnc-alleging-supplements-contained-illegal-ingredients-1445543143"><strong>warning letters about BMPEA to five different companies, although not to GNC</strong></a>. It is a powerful synthetic stimulant.<br />
In sharp contrast, <a href="http://www.calmclinic.com/anxiety/drugs/picamilon"><strong>picamilon</strong></a> isn&#8217;t synthetic at all. It is a combination of GABA (a completely natural substance made from the amino acid glutamine) with niacin (vitamin B3). The combination is much more effective in crossing the blood-brain barrier than GABA alone. Although the combination of the two natural supplements GABA and B3 has usually been sold under the name picamilon, it has also been sold under the two names together.<br />
GABA is produced by our own bodies and is the natural way we calm ourselves. It is by far the best remedy for anxiety, but is rarely used by conventional doctors, who generally favor toxic and usually ineffective drugs, often, as we have reported, with <a href="https://anh-usa.org/anxiety-natural-supplement/"><strong>tragic results</strong></a>.<br />
The FDA working through the Oregon AG is especially bizarre. If the agency thought there was a safety issue, or any other concern with picamilon, it could take its own action to remove it from the market. It has full power to do so. If there was an issue with the ingredient in question, why should it be removed only in Oregon and not everywhere else? The real reason that the agency would work through the Oregon AG is to try to test the waters and keep a lower profile. It is doubtful that the Oregon AG understands any of this.<br />
The AG’s lawsuit follows a recent <a href="http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Regulation/Sen-McCaskill-calls-for-vinpocetine-and-picamilon-supplements-to-be-pulled-from-shelves"><strong>call</strong></a> from Sen. McCaskill to pull both picamilon and vinpocetine (another supplement for the brain, especially useful to promote blood flow there) from store shelves pending an investigation into whether they should be sold as prescription drugs rather than as dietary supplements. As noted, we think the FDA is behind this too.<br />
<strong><em>Action Alerts!</em></strong> Tell the FDA (and if you’re in Oregon or Missouri, tell the Oregon AG and Sen. McCaskill too) that picamilon is not a synthetic drug but a combination of natural ingredients that must continue to be freely available to consumers. <strong><em>Please send your message immediately.</em></strong><br />
<a href="https://anh-usa.org/action-alert-fda-attacks-picamilon/" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-15336 aligncenter" src="https://anh-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Take-Action1.png" alt="Take-Action" width="150" height="39" /></a></p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/fda-attacking-supplements-to-boost-alzheimers-drug-sales/">Expected New “Blockbuster” Alzheimer’s Drug</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/fda-attacking-supplements-to-boost-alzheimers-drug-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Nail in the Coffin” for Calcium Supplements?</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/nail-in-the-coffin-for-calcium-supplements/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nail-in-the-coffin-for-calcium-supplements</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/nail-in-the-coffin-for-calcium-supplements/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regenerative Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulse of Natural Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=16747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No, of course not. But it is true you shouldn’t take them alone. A new British Medical Journal study has created more headlines in the mainstream media. One article opened with this: “A new study should put the final nail in the coffin for any lingering beliefs that calcium supplements are good for you.” That’s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/nail-in-the-coffin-for-calcium-supplements/">“Nail in the Coffin” for Calcium Supplements?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, of course not. But it is true you shouldn’t take them alone.<br />
A new <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4580"><strong><em>British Medical Journal</em></strong><strong> study</strong></a> has created more headlines in the mainstream media. <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/health/diet-fitness/calcium-supplements-or-dairy-doesnt-strengthen-bones-study-finds-n435726"><strong>One article</strong></a> opened with this: “A new study should put the final nail in the coffin for any lingering beliefs that calcium supplements are good for you.”<br />
That’s odd. It was only a few years ago that the World Health Organization wanted to put calcium in everyone’s water supply. <a href="https://anh-usa.org/fluoride-is-not-enough-now-they-want-to-add-calcium-to-our-drinking-water/"><strong>We didn’t like</strong></a> that proposal at all, but not because we think that calcium supplementation is a bad idea.<br />
The actual data in the new BMJ study do not support the strange conclusions drawn by either Dr. Mark J. Bolland, the study’s author, or the media. Note this sentence from the study’s conclusion: “The 1-2% increase in [bone marrow density] observed with increased calcium intake would be predicted to produce a 5-10% reduction in risk of fracture.&#8221; This hardly suggests that calcium is worthless. Bone marrow density more usually declines with age, not increases.<br />
This is familiar territory for Prof. Bolland, who has been staking out an anti-supplement position for some time with regard to bone health and osteoporosis. He <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4125316/"><strong>published a paper</strong></a> in 2013 warning that calcium supplementation leads to calcification in the heart and arteries—a conclusion that has been disputed by other studies that did not find this risk.<br />
More importantly, Bolland ignores a key point: to maximize bone health, it is crucial to combine calcium with <a href="http://www.lifeextension.com/Magazine/2008/3/Protecting-Bone-And-Arterial-Health-With-Vitamin-K2/Page-01"><strong>vitamin K2</strong></a>, which <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/12/16/vitamin-k2.aspx"><strong>helps move calcium</strong></a> into the proper areas in your body. Vitamin D and magnesium are also critical to getting calcium where it needs to go, and not letting it lodge in blood vessels and the heart. Not surprisingly, Bolland <a href="http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(09)01007-9/abstract"><strong>has even contested</strong></a> the usefulness of vitamin D for bone health, despite the overwhelming evidence that has convinced most of the medical establishment.<br />
You can guess where the professor ends up. In addition to recommending against supplemental calcium, he concludes that people “should be encouraged to take agents with proven efficacy in preventing [fractures]”—that is, pharmaceutical drugs.<br />
And what are the “agents with proven efficacy” Dr. Bolland recommends? Bisphosphonates, the largest class of osteoporosis drugs. And they carry the usual list of nasty side effects, including hives, headache, constipation, joint pain, dizziness, blood in the urine, and muscle pain. But those aren’t the main issues. An <a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/new-cautions-about-long-term-use-of-bone-drugs/"><strong>FDA review in 2012</strong></a> acknowledged a much graver cause for concern. These drugs do not create new bone. They just prevent the elimination of old bone. This leads to weaker bones in some people. Oral surgeons notice that extractions from bone treated this way do not heal well—or do not heal at all. There have been cases of jawbone death, and believe us, you do not want to have your jawbone die.<br />
There is also a link to esophageal cancer. Moreover, the FDA found little benefit from the drugs after three to five years of use. Bisphosphonates should have been removed from the market. Why weren’t they? How can Dr. Bolland still recommend them?<br />
The only answer we can come up with is money. Big Pharma can’t make money from calcium and vitamin supplements, but it can from osteoporosis medications that patients take for years on end.<br />
About that World Health Organization proposal to put calcium in drinking water—government and international agencies never get this kind of thing right and should just stop interfering. But what really alarmed us was the idea of doing without co-factors such as vitamins K and D. Nutrients—isolated and without vital co-factors, forced on consumers—are not the answer to bone health, nor are dangerous drugs. We build healthy bone the way we build healthy bodies: through proper diet, exercise, and appropriate supplementation.</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/nail-in-the-coffin-for-calcium-supplements/">“Nail in the Coffin” for Calcium Supplements?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/nail-in-the-coffin-for-calcium-supplements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Supplements Are</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/what-supplements-are/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-supplements-are</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/what-supplements-are/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=13970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dietary supplements refer to a broad range of products that fill gaps in our diet and provide natural health care remedies. Multivitamins, omega-3/fish oil, vitamin D, vitamin C, and calcium are just a few of the thousands of products that more than 150 million Americans regularly consume. Congress has defined “dietary supplement” as a product [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/what-supplements-are/">What Supplements Are</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dietary supplements refer to a broad range of products that fill gaps in our diet and provide natural health care remedies. Multivitamins, omega-3/fish oil, vitamin D, vitamin C, and calcium are just a few of the thousands of products that more than 150 million Americans regularly consume.<br />
Congress has defined “dietary supplement” as a product that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Is intended to supplement the diet;</li>
<li>Contains vitamins, minerals, herbs or other botanicals, amino acids, and other defined substances or their constituents;</li>
<li>Is intended to be taken by mouth; and</li>
<li>Is labeled as being a dietary supplement.</li>
</ul>
<p>Products that adhere to this definition are considered a food product and presumed to be safe, which means they are subject to different regulations than drugs or pharmaceuticals.<br />
Products that contain ingredients outside this definition like pharmaceutical additives or illegal substances, are not dietary supplements and are removed from the market by the FDA.</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/what-supplements-are/">What Supplements Are</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/what-supplements-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catch 22</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/micrositeare-my-supplements-safecatch-22/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=micrositeare-my-supplements-safecatch-22</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/micrositeare-my-supplements-safecatch-22/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=13976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Decades of research has affirmed that natural products are safe and effective, and in many cases, can be a desirable alternative to pharmaceutical drugs for promoting health, alleviating symptoms, and curing disease. However, regulators such as the FDA have created a “Catch-22” that prevents dietary supplement manufacturers from informing consumers about potential health benefits and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/micrositeare-my-supplements-safecatch-22/">Catch 22</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decades of research has affirmed that natural products are safe and effective, and in many cases, can be a desirable alternative to pharmaceutical drugs for promoting health, alleviating symptoms, and curing disease.<br />
However, regulators such as the FDA have created a “Catch-22” that prevents dietary supplement manufacturers from informing consumers about potential health benefits and introducing innovative new ingredients. The Catch-22 also threatens many supplements that are already on the market.<br />
If a dietary supplement manufacturer wants to make any statement the FDA deems to be a “disease claim” or introduce a new ingredient the FDA deems to be a “new dietary ingredient,” the manufacturer must withstand the extremely lengthy and expensive drug approval process that is only meant for traditional pharmaceuticals, not dietary supplements which are regulated as a category of food.<br />
It is impossible for most dietary supplement manufacturers to withstand the financial burden of the drug approval process, which can cost millions or even billions of dollars, because natural ingredients that have been in use for decades cannot be patented. Without patent protection, dietary supplement manufactures are unable to recoup the cost of a drug-like preapproval process.<br />
Forcing dietary supplements into a regulatory framework that was designed only for pharmaceuticals raises cost for consumers, decreases innovation and choice, and could force tens of thousands of safe supplements out of the market.<br />
Defending dietary supplements from attacks by the media, the pharmaceutical industry, and elected officials who prefer a pre-market approval approach is a top priority.</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/micrositeare-my-supplements-safecatch-22/">Catch 22</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/micrositeare-my-supplements-safecatch-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Science</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/current-science/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=current-science</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/current-science/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=13972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supplements vs. Pharmaceuticals “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.” –Hippocrates (Father of Western Medicine) Like food, dietary supplements are one of the safest things we put in our bodies. Products like multivitamins, omega-3/fish oil, vitamin D, vitamin C, and calcium can be used to fortify your health or treat ailments and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/current-science/">Current Science</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Supplements vs. Pharmaceuticals</h2>
<blockquote><p>“Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.” –Hippocrates (Father of Western Medicine)</p></blockquote>
<p>Like food, dietary supplements are one of the safest things we put in our bodies. Products like multivitamins, omega-3/fish oil, vitamin D, vitamin C, and calcium can be used to fortify your health or treat ailments and they are part of the regular health routine of millions of Americans.<br />
According to the most recent report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers ’ National Poison Data System (NPDS), dietary supplements caused ZERO deaths, in stark comparison to 125,000 deaths per year caused by pharmaceutical drugs that are taken correctly. In fact, you are far more likely to die from a lightening strike or plane crash than by taking a dietary supplement.<br />
Since passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) more than 20 years ago, regulators have rightly treated dietary supplements as a category of food, presumed to be safe for consumption just like food.<br />
With dietary supplements’ strong record of safe usage, especially compared to pharmaceuticals which go through years of pre-market safety testing and still cause hundreds of thousands of deaths each year, it is clear where any efforts at increased safety regulation should be focused. However, misinformed politicians and self-interested pharmaceutical companies continue to push for a pre-market approval system for dietary supplements which runs contrary to logic and more than 20 years of successful dietary supplement regulation.</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/current-science/">Current Science</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/current-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Supplements Are Regulated</title>
		<link>https://anh-usa.org/how-supplements-are-regulated/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-supplements-are-regulated</link>
					<comments>https://anh-usa.org/how-supplements-are-regulated/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facts About Supplements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anh-usa.org/?p=13968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dietary supplements are zealously regulated by multiple federal agencies in order to ensure products are safe and that product labels are truthful and accurate. Claims that dietary supplements are unregulated completely overlook the extensive regulatory framework that governs the industry, and ignore the industry’s lengthy record of safety and benefit to consumers. In 1994, Congress [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/how-supplements-are-regulated/">How Supplements Are Regulated</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dietary supplements are zealously regulated by multiple federal agencies in order to ensure products are safe and that product labels are truthful and accurate. Claims that dietary supplements are unregulated completely overlook the extensive regulatory framework that governs the industry, and ignore the industry’s lengthy record of safety and benefit to consumers.<br />
In 1994, Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) which established the current framework for dietary supplement regulation. Under DSHEA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) were given power to regulate virtually every aspect of the dietary supplement industry including manufacturing, labeling, and marketing.<br />
Because dietary supplements are derived from such ingredients as vitamins, minerals, herbs, botanicals, and amino acids, they are regulated as a category of food. This distinction separates dietary supplements from medical drugs and pharmaceuticals which are comprised of unique chemical compounds and require heightened regulatory oversight, including pre-market approval. Under DSHEA, dietary supplement ingredients with a long history of safe use are “grandfathered in” and considered safe by the FDA.<br />
If a dietary supplement manufacturer wants to introduce a new dietary supplement ingredient (NDI), it must provide the FDA with notice and safety information. DSHEA also gave the FDA and FTC additional powers to remove any products from the market that are deemed unsafe or mislabeled.<br />
The regulatory structure set out in DSHEA gives federal agencies ample power to oversee the dietary supplement industry. It is in the best interest of dietary supplement manufacturers, retailers, and consumers that DSHEA is fully enforced. The industry supports the FDA and FTC in keeping bad actors out of the market so that consumers can continue to enjoy access to safe and affordable products as they have for the more than two decades since DSHEA was enacted.</p><p>The post <a href="https://anh-usa.org/how-supplements-are-regulated/">How Supplements Are Regulated</a> first appeared on <a href="https://anh-usa.org">Alliance for Natural Health USA - Protecting Natural Health</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://anh-usa.org/how-supplements-are-regulated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
