5 responses to “Round Up End Round”
Leave a Reply
Related Articles
-
Jun 8, 2017 0Fighting Back: ANH, Allies Leading the Charge for Natural Medicine
The FDA has been waging an all-out war against natural medicine. In response, we are uniting with allies to articulate the truth. Will the FDA listen to science, or Big Pharma? We’ve been keeping readers up to date on the FDA’s salvo of new regulations and rules for the compounding industry, whi...
-
Sep 1, 2014 0Myth: GMOs Are Environmentally Friendly
GMOs are not environmentally friendly, and have not lessened the use of toxic chemicals—in fact, they’ve increased it. Many crops are genetically modified to withstand the use of extremely toxic herbicides like Roundup. However, weeds are becoming increasingly tolerant of Roundup, creating ...
-
Aug 10, 2010 1The Campaign to Cover Up Americans from Sun Exposure; what are the risks versus the benefits
The Campaign to Cover Up Americans from Sun Exposure; what are the risks versus the benefits The campaign to address Americans’ sun exposure has become the standard of care in American medicine. One of this country’s leading medical educators and researchers, Michael Holick, MD, even lost his...
-
Jan 19, 2010 11
Warning! Heavy metals!
For many years, although the EPA acknowledged that effective screening for body burdens of heavy metals (e.g., lead and mercury) could be accomplished with tissue samples, such as fingernails and hair, conventional medicine demonized this practice by integrative practitioners. (more…)...
-
Apr 14, 2009 0
Failure to Consider the Risks
Americans consume more medications than any other population on earth. And they’ve become increasingly aware that while medications are prescribed for certain benefits, the risks involved must be taken seriously. The economic stimulus legislation created a council of up to fifteen federal emp...
-
Nov 8, 2018 8The Hidden Costs of Local Meat
Federal rules are making locally raised meat more expensive. There is an increasing demand for locally-raised meat as more and more Americans reject the products of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), where animals are kept in squalid conditions. What many Americans may not know, howe...
-
Nov 30, 2010 0
Food Safety Bill Passes—With Important Changes Secured by ANH-USA, Its Allies, and YOU
...
-
Jan 24, 2012 30New Proposal May Put the Nation’s Food Safety at Even Greater Risk
The USDA’s food safety wing may come under control of the FDA. This will mean more power, wider scope—and greater corruption. (more…)...
-
Aug 2, 2011 25Gluten Sensitivity: Why is FDA Dragging Its Feet?
Nearly 20 million Americans experience dire health problems from eating foods that contain gluten. Congress told FDA to define the term “gluten-free” for food manufacturers by 2008. Why are they still “studying the matter”? A new Action Alert! (more…)...
-
Aug 13, 2013 18No Free Speech Without a License!
State licensing boards are trying to prevent unlicensed citizens from even talking about certain subjects. Here are some of the latest gag orders. (more…)...
Please stop make something that cause harm to humanity. End of request.
Thank you for considering human health.
May products carry cancer warnings … and people still buy them. Why does RoundUp not get a warning lable?
HUMANS ARE JUST MEDIANS FOR PROFIT, WERE THE ONLY SPECIES THAT USES CURRINCYS, WERE THE ONLY SPECIES THAT ISN’T POPULATION REGULATED. ESSENTIALLY”LIVESTOCK”!
Many products carry cancer warnings … and people still buy them. Why does Round Up not get a warning label?
RoundUp’s main ingredient, glyphosate, is the suspected cause of cancer in many people. There are currently several thousand lawsuits against Bayer/Monsanto. Bayer (formerly one of the German industrial giants in Hitler’s war machine during WWII, bought Monsanto after accepting the accuracy and truth of Monsanto scientists’ reports of the chemical’s safety. Neither the FDA nor the EPA has tested glyphosate and they won’t. One, because it is considered scientifically unethical to test a suspected carcinogen on humans and two, because the known correlation between glyphosate and disease is high. So, there is no human clear data such as to require a warning label. Giles Seralini performed the only mammalian study of glyphosate that I know of published in the journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology 2012, but the journal has retracted the article. His study on rats fed with chow on which glyphosate had been sprayed showed that tumors formed in most of the rats but there were complicating factors. When giant corporations are suspect, the money at stake is in the billions and changes will be made to avoid this loss. Bayer/Monsanto has already set aside a victim compensation fund of roughly $10 billion. Start reading government website data from the FDA, EPA, Dept of Agriculture and others. Don’t rely on what you see/hear only on tv/internet. They control that narrative and only tell you what they want you to know.