Latest Natural Health News

WHO’s Pandemic Treaty: A Blueprint for Global Control?

WHO’s Pandemic Treaty: A Blueprint for Global Control?
Share This Article

The World Health Organization (WHO) is accelerating efforts to finalize its Pandemic Treaty before President-elect Donald Trump takes office and potentially derails their power grab. We cannot let them fast-track this treaty. Action Alert!


THE TOPLINE

  • With negotiations set for early December, proponents of the Pandemic Treaty appear eager to finalize it before Donald Trump takes office, since he may challenge the WHO’s authority and global health policies and even withdraw from the WHO altogether.
  • The treaty introduces a global bio-surveillance system and shifts control toward pharmaceutical companies, enabling rushed approvals of vaccines and drugs, with minimal accountability and oversight.
  • Provisions against “misinformation” aim to suppress dissenting views, threatening free speech and alternative perspectives, while reinforcing WHO’s control over global health narratives.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is racing against the clock to finalize its controversial Pandemic Treaty, with negotiations scheduled for December 2-6. Precious Matsoso, co-chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, has made it clear: there are mere days left to close the deal: “We don’t have six months left to finish negotiations. We only have a couple of days left, precisely because the geopolitical environment is so challenging,” she said. The pressure is mounting, and the treaty’s supporters seem determined to push it through before Donald Trump takes office. This should alarm anyone who cares about their health sovereignty.

This treaty is being sold as a tool to “better prepare for and respond to future pandemics,” but scratch beneath the surface, and you’ll find a far more troubling agenda. The Pandemic Treaty isn’t about protecting public health—it’s about consolidating power, silencing dissent, and handing unprecedented control to unelected bureaucrats at the WHO. All of it latent—until such time Director General Tedros, or any successor of his, chooses to declare the next ‘public health emergency of international concern’ or PHEIC.

A Trojan Horse for Global Tyranny

Let’s be clear: this treaty isn’t just about pandemic preparedness. It’s a blueprint for centralized control, cloaked in the language of public health. Here’s what’s really at stake:

  • Surrendering Sovereignty: The treaty proposes sweeping powers for the WHO, including the ability to dictate how countries respond to pandemics. National governments would be pressured to align with WHO directives, undermining their sovereignty and ability to make independent decisions.
  • Surveillance State: Under the guise of the “One Health” approach, the treaty seeks to establish a global bio-surveillance apparatus. This would enable unprecedented data collection and sharing—effectively turning every citizen into a data point for unelected officials to analyze and exploit.
  • Big Pharma’s Payday: This treaty funnels power and profits directly into the hands of pharmaceutical giants. Emergency approvals for investigational products, rushed vaccines, and gene-based drugs will become the norm. Safety? Efficacy? Accountability? Those concerns will be swept under the rug in the name of “following the science.”
  • Crushing Free Speech: Provisions to combat “misinformation” are little more than a thinly veiled attack on free speech. Any narrative that challenges the WHO’s one-size-fits-all approach will be silenced, critics will be smeared, and alternative perspectives will be erased.

The U.S. at a Crossroads

The re-election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency adds an interesting wrinkle to these processes. In 2020, Trump took steps to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO, recognizing the organization’s troubling trajectory. This move was reversed by President Joe Biden in 2021, but Trump’s return raises questions about America’s future involvement. Could a renewed withdrawal be on the horizon? And how might that impact the treaty’s adoption? Trump’s pick for heading up the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been an outspoken critic of the COVID vaccines and the government’s response during COVID, is another indication that the new Administration will not be bullied by the WHO.

The Endgame

With the lessons from the COVID era still fresh in our minds, we can no longer accept the notion that the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty is about safeguarding public health. It’s about power and control. Control over nations. Control over information. Control over you. It represents a chilling vision of the future, where global elites dictate every aspect of pandemic response, from what you’re allowed to say online, how much of America’s anti-microbial weaponry must be exported to other countries, to what medications you need to take or inject into your body.

We must stay vigilant and demand accountability before it’s too late. This is not about protecting public health—it’s about protecting power and asserting control over the 8 billion of the rest of us. And don’t kid yourself—the people who are pushing this treaty know it.

The WHO has shown its hand. The question now is: will we let them take the rest of the deck?

Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to reject the Pandemic Treaty and the IHR amendments approved at the 77th WHA meeting. Please send your message immediately.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts